Accused of a fallacy? Suspect a fallacy? Ask Dr. Bo and the community!

Quickly register to comment, ask and respond to questions, and get FREE access to our passive online course on cognitive biases!

one moment please...

Questions? Friendly Debate? Deep Conversations? Be a Call-in Guest on the Dr. Bo Show!

Modal (Scope) Fallacy

(also known as: fallacy of modal logic, misconditionalization, fallacy of neccessity)

Description: Modal logic studies ways in which propositions can be true or false, the most common being necessity and possibility.  Some propositions are necessarily true/false, and others are possibly true/false.  In short, a modal fallacy involves making a formal argument invalid by confusing the scope of what is actually necessary or possible.

Example #1:

If Debbie and TJ have two sons and two daughters, then they must have at least one son.

Debbie and TJ have two sons and two daughters.

Therefore, Debbie and TJ must have at least one son.

Explanation: We are told that Debbie and TJ have two sons and two daughters, so logically, by necessity, they must have at least one son.  However, to say that Debbie and TJ must have at least one son, is to confuse the scope of the modal, or in this case, to take the contingent fact that applies to the specific case that is conditional upon Debbie and TJ having the two sons and two daughters, to the general hypothetical case where they don’t have to have any children.  Therefore, if they don’t have to have any children, then they certainly don’t have to (necessary fact) have at least one son.

Example #2:

If Barak is President, then he must be 35 years-old or older.

Explanation: Technically this is fallacious.  There is no condition in which someone necessarily is a certain age.  More accurately, we would say:

It must be the case that if Barak is President, then he is 35 or older.

The “must” in this second statement covers the whole condition, not just the age of the president.


Curtis, G. N. (1993). The Concept of Logical Form. Indiana University.

Registered User Comments

Krista Neckles
Monday, May 28, 2018 - 03:29:07 PM
Hello Sir,

I still have a lot of trouble understanding this fallacy. Could you explain it further?

Thank you Sir.

login to reply
1 reply
0 votes
Reply To Comment

Bo Bennett, PhD
Monday, May 28, 2018 - 06:52:54 PM
I don't think I can do much more than I have here. Try this:

login to reply
0 votes
Reply To Comment

Become a Logical Fallacy Master. Choose Your Poison.

Logically Fallacious is one of the most comprehensive collections of logical fallacies with all original examples and easy to understand descriptions; perfect for educators, debaters, or anyone who wants to improve his or her reasoning skills.

Get the book, Logically Fallacious by Bo Bennett, PhD by selecting one of the following options:

Not Much of a Reader? No Problem!

Enroll in the Mastering Logical Fallacies Online Course. Over 10 hours of video and interactive learning. Go beyond the book!

Enroll in the Fallacy-A-Day Passive Course. Sit back and learn fallacies the easy way—in just a few minutes per day, via e-mail delivery.

Have a podcast or know someone who does? Putting on a conference? Dr. Bennett is available for interviews and public speaking events. Contact him directly here.

About Archieboy Holdings, LLC. Privacy Policy Other Books Written by Bo
 Website Software Copyright 2019, Archieboy Holdings, LLC.